Comments on: Jacqueline Passey is Not Attractive, So Short Her

By: W.C. Varones

W.C. Varones — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 01:14:12 +0000

It’s Rudy Giuliani!

By: Paul

Paul — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:50:11 +0000

I don’t read your blog much, but do you have pictures of yourself posted so we can rate your attractiveness?

Point being, that when you post a long, insufferable public post about how incredibly irresistable a catch you are, we (as unattractive as some might be) have every right to give her the verbal thrumming she so richly deserves.

She claims that she’s more* attractive than 86% of humanity. By virtue of those statements, she has placed herself in a position to be judged by us. And judge we will.

She’s “HWP”, nothing more. If all it took to be more attractive than 86% of humanity was height-weight-proportionality, I’d be a movie star.

*her “self selecting” comment suggests that she’s in the top 86% of the already most attractive percentile, which I can assure you, she’s so…so not.

By: Paul

Paul — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 20:01:54 +0000

Every picture I’ve ever seen of her, she’s always looked a bit…orange.

By: Zach

Zach — Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:34:44 +0000

I am sure she is much more attractive than most of the people who are posting on the comments area. I would say she is not movie star attractive, but is certainly more attractive than the average american, and I would guess that blog commenters (myself included) are more likely to be less attractive than the mean. I don’t read your blog much, but do you have pictures of yourself posted so we can rate your attractiveness?

By: Caveman

Caveman — Tue, 13 Mar 2007 04:06:52 +0000

Unga-Bunga?

By: Thomas L. Knapp

Thomas L. Knapp — Mon, 12 Mar 2007 16:15:00 +0000

Stock analysis: Sound investment. I’d go long on it and ride it all the way up.

In English: I’d hit it. Oh, yeah. Much. Often.

But really: Hey, most people have a mental investment in both self-image and attractiveness to others. That’s why my own blog portrays me about 40 pounds lighter than I am at this very moment, with my head freshly shaven instead of stubbly, and wearing a suit instead of boxers and flip-flops. If being smarter than you and destined to rule the world isn’t enough for Jacqueline Passey — if she also feels that she must enhance the portrayal of her formidable biological assets — what of it?

By: Take a look at more Jackie Forehead Passey

Take a look at more Jackie Forehead Passey — Tue, 26 Sep 2006 03:01:40 +0000

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xCSSQcZCCNc

By: M.C. Curtis

M.C. Curtis — Sun, 03 Sep 2006 17:10:31 +0000

She forgot to mention in her bio how humble she is.

By: jeffbot

jeffbot — Mon, 21 Aug 2006 10:12:03 +0000

Is she’s so attractive why does she have to post personal ads?

By: Ignorant Critics » Quality Dates Quality, Or, You’re Not Good Enough For Me

Mon, 21 Aug 2006 03:02:22 +0000

[...] Read the 500-some-odd comments after her post, too. This woman has become the latest celebrity in the blogosphere, as everyone seems to be lining up to take a crack at her. We here at Ignorant Critics never want to be left out of the party, of course. This is true entertainment. [...]

By: Calvin

Calvin — Mon, 21 Aug 2006 00:52:48 +0000

[quote]One has been very interesting regarding screenwriting, which I know nothing of,another is into horticulture.[/quote]

You can lead a whore to culture, but you can’t make her think.

By: Dr. DRE

Dr. DRE — Sat, 19 Aug 2006 18:02:40 +0000

Doesn’t anyone else notice in that photo of her on the plane that she looks like Frank-N-Furter?

By: vegicat

vegicat — Fri, 18 Aug 2006 22:00:44 +0000

As somemone specifically not looking for a new partner, partly because I’m barely out of one with an NPD, I have had some good talks via email from a couple of people I’ve met through an ad. One has been very interesting regarding screenwriting, which I know nothing of,another is into horticulture.
So I have met two seemingly nice men from an ad I specifically said I was not looking for dating-just penpals. I did have a pretty limiting ad- but it mostly said things like… I don’t like angry people, or people who argue for no reason, or who don’t read books. If I was being all snotty and particular about not finding people who were ‘beneath’ me, I wouldn’t have a chance to meet someone who could teach me about horticulture or screenwriting. The only thing it proves that there were so many responses to such a self-centered ad is that plenty of people like me saw it on another website being laughed at (I was on a Narcissistic Personality Disorder victim support site), and it was really the laugh it was described as, or else they are people who are pretending to have the multitude of characteristics you seem worthy of, on a lark…. or flat out crazy people who think signs hace shown them you two belong together. I doubt any of the men who replied would allow themselves to be put on a show-and-tell list to prove they actually exist, so I’ll have to go on believing the whole thing’s a farce.

By: um and

um and — Fri, 18 Aug 2006 13:24:56 +0000

I followed roughtly the same path to JMPP’s blog (there is a more recent post remarking on the popularity of the entry in which she itemizes her assets, as quoted here) and was particularly struck by this claim:
# I’m relatively young (whereas 82% of American adult women are over 30 years old)

Which annoyed me so much that I actually went and looked up the life expectancy of American women to confirm my suspicion that, indeed, 80% of American women should be older than her. If “adulthood” starts at 18, and the average life expectancy of an American woman is a wee bit over 80 years, that means that women over 30 should make up just over 80% of the population of Adult Women. I heard a rumor about a thing called a baby boom. Call me crazy but I’m figuring that more than accounts for the wee shift upwards in that figure. I don’t know where she is drawing the “old” line, and I can’t be bothered to open the census spreadsheet she’s provided, but the problem with Jackie Passey is not that she is not attractive, it is that she is a totally self-important moron. I’m sorry that she didn’t have to take any math classes in her four years of college.

If she really gets hit on that much, it might be a little something more than just her stature and physical features at work. Like the fact that she is still baring her midriff at 30 which does hint at a certain desire for affirmation and attention.

I’m getting catty, so I’ll leave it there. I even deleted my catty comment about hot-or-not.

By: smartalek

smartalek — Fri, 18 Aug 2006 07:47:59 +0000

“Getting hit on in public requires two ingredients 1) breathing and 2) being a woman.”
The first of those is sometimes negotiable.

By: Jeff

Jeff — Fri, 18 Aug 2006 04:31:40 +0000

This girl is the female version of Jay Leno if he got hit in the face with a shovel by a crazed fan.

By: alimum

alimum — Thu, 17 Aug 2006 19:49:44 +0000

She forgot to list her American Citenzenship as an asset and it was never mentioned in determining her true value on the world market–might she be more valuable to foreign investors looking to gain a foothold in the States?

By: RG

RG — Thu, 17 Aug 2006 05:04:33 +0000

After extensive comparative analysis, male households would be well advised to swap their can openers for Jacquelin’s chin. Same utility with, apparently, ‘high libido’. It should be noted the cost of carry is much higher.

By: RD

RD — Wed, 16 Aug 2006 22:29:51 +0000

If the greater fool theory holds correct, which seems that it is considering there are those posting on here actually thinking Jacqueline is hot, then this may work out as an excellent transaction. Consider an asset swap if you will in a foreign market. Maybe even in Russia does that fool exist and you can swap your sub par asset for the coveted Russian Legs.

By: Liz

Liz — Wed, 16 Aug 2006 21:15:20 +0000

Thank you for taking this person out in one incredibly well written, hilarious blog entry. Y’all rule! And Maurice, JP’s internet BF and BFF, please just stoooooppppppppp!

By: Andrew

Andrew — Wed, 16 Aug 2006 16:05:24 +0000

Best Jacqueline photo ever:

http://jacquelinepassey.blogs.com/photos/2006newyorkcity/cimg0546.html

By: NoPostion

NoPostion — Wed, 16 Aug 2006 15:05:10 +0000

For those of you wanting to take a postion in this market sector but desiring diversification and lower expense ratios, please consider investing in the Barclay iShares ETF representing a broad (get it, broad) index of the sector. Trading under GRL, this sector play offers hedging opportunities along with exposure to a dynamic market opportunity. The components of GRL have been selected to provide ongoing value with potential upside. The WAM (weighted average maturity) of the fund is laddered. Please review the prospectus prior to investing and recognize that prices, while offering short term upside, will unfortunately decline in the long term. Note: Jackie P. is not a constituent of GRL.

By: Quality Male

Quality Male — Tue, 15 Aug 2006 19:35:36 +0000

But will she underperform her sector? Isn’t it possible that she could outperform an equally weighted (heh) basket of obnoxious skanks?

By: K2

K2 — Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:13:52 +0000

If she’s so damned attractive and cosmopolitan, why does she have the same janky outfit on every time I see a photo of her?

By: Mr Juggles

Mr Juggles — Tue, 15 Aug 2006 13:30:14 +0000

Thank you for that pic, Jacqueline Passey’s Internet BF. It looks like a picture of the woman we wrote about above.

By: Maurice W.

Maurice W. — Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:52:35 +0000

Jacqueline is beautiful. Check this out:

http://home.comcast.net/~waynemv/JacqsBlogParty/HPIM1037rc.jpg

By: Mr Juggles

Mr Juggles — Tue, 15 Aug 2006 08:06:09 +0000

JD saw her linked via MarginalRevolution which is an awesome blog. We’ve all seen her linked in different places in the past.

By: Tom Jacobs

Tom Jacobs — Tue, 15 Aug 2006 05:10:13 +0000

How did you find this broad?

By: team gingerbread

team gingerbread — Tue, 15 Aug 2006 04:57:57 +0000

Well said, I concur.

By: Umfoofoo

Umfoofoo — Tue, 15 Aug 2006 03:55:37 +0000

She looks like she could be Guiliani’s daughter.