Hedge Funds and Love

by Drinky McDiligence

Hedge Funds have become ubiquitous in today’s pop culture according to the NY Times. They use this snippet from the long running soap opera “All My Children” as proof:

Soft light gently illuminates two former lovers, eyes only for each other, as they stand on a balcony on a warm, starry night.”Love isn’t like a hedge fund, you know?” Ryan tells Kendall. “You can’t have all your money in one investment, and if it looks a little shaky, you can’t just buy into something that looks a little bit safer.”

Obviously, the writers have no idea what a hedge fund is; they probably assume that it’s where all the stock brokers work. What they should say is that love isn’t like a non-diversified traditional long-only fund.

In reality, love is exactly like a hedge fund. Love is a limited partnership structure (LP), it takes a large initial investment, and is largely unregulated. Frequently, it uses an aggressive strategy, relying on large directional bets and substantial amounts of leverage. The plan is to generate significant alpha (using the Lipper Love Average as a benchmark) but it is not uncommon to see a hedge fund or a love relationship with an unsuitably low Sortino ratio, indicating that it has strayed from it’s raison d’etre. This is a hedge fund (marriage) destined for fund outflows (divorce).

Love is relatively illiquid, such that if it takes on large speculative investments, and develops into something like a live-in relationship or marriage, there will be a lock-up period. This is where derivatives and hedging come into play. According to our possibly fabricated research, the married put was developed specifically for use in reducing the downside risk in instititional marriage markets.

It floors your downside, and there is unlimited upside; if the love falters or a better substitute arrives, you can walk away with no marginal pain. The best hedge funds just as the best marriages understand risk management and create an environment where downside protection is a given.

Share this Post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
Related Reseach:

Email this post Email this post | Print This Post Print This Post




Comments

  1. AngryAnalyst
    December 12th, 2006 | 4:42 pm

    Will this be on the Level II exam?

  2. December 12th, 2006 | 4:48 pm

    Yes. But only for people taking it in Hartford.

  3. December 12th, 2006 | 5:26 pm

    […] Read […]

  4. December 12th, 2006 | 6:37 pm

    […] Says Long or Short. […]

  5. December 13th, 2006 | 5:53 pm

    Write-Offs: 12.13.06…

    $$$RAB Capital’s holiday party: likely better than yours, more fishy. [Telegraph via Banker’s Ball] $$$Hedge Funds and Love [Long or Short Capital] $$$Question of the day: would an investment banker or a pharmacist take part in group sex (or mushroom…

  6. Florian
    December 14th, 2006 | 5:56 am

    I reckon the article should have shown also the P/L when for an uncovered short on your marriage (divorce, no prenup).

  7. December 14th, 2006 | 11:54 am

    The Marriage Only dotted line is the pricing for Marriage and Divorce. Love is largely unregulated, but you can’t just short love. You probably need to find some physics PhD to develop a model.

    The closest naked marriage short equivalent is something like a marriage of opportunity such as a Green Card marriage. That’s some other sort of alternative investment, probably along the lines of factoring.

    Or I guess marriage without love is like a strip. But at least you get the face value at the end of the term, even though you’re not getting the coupons.

  8. December 17th, 2006 | 9:49 pm

    Business, technology and knowledge carnival first edition….

    Welcome to the December 17, 2006 edition of Business, Technology and Knowledge, a new blog carnival.
    The original publication date of this carnival was going to be the 22nd of December, but we’ve had such a great round of submissions that we&#…

  9. December 18th, 2006 | 2:37 am

    […] Drinky McDiligence compares Love and Hedge Funds. It’s interesting, but I feel I needed to know a little more about hedge funds to fully appreciate it. […]

  10. December 19th, 2006 | 12:27 am

    I’m no financial expert, but I know good, clean humor when I see it! That was a fun read.

  11. December 19th, 2006 | 12:49 am

    […] Mr Juggles presents Hedge Funds and Love posted at Long or Short Capital. […]

  12. Ron
    December 20th, 2006 | 1:02 am

    I thought you might be interested to know that your article made it to my site. I really enjoyed reading it.

  13. December 20th, 2006 | 10:43 am

    Yes, he certainly knows what he is talking about

  14. December 20th, 2006 | 3:30 pm

    A Hedge Fund… By Any Other Word Would Smell As Swe…

    ohbabyitsbess: if I have to write goldman sachs  or bonus  one more time I m going to kindly ask you to run a sharp object across my throat. jfcarney: I was just going to say that. except I was going to……

  15. December 20th, 2006 | 5:09 pm

    Carnival of the Vanities #222: Early Christm…

    Merry Christmas and welcome to the 222nd edition of Carnival of the Vanities. Because it’s Christmas and because I’m in the Christmas spirit - and because I have a viscious case of intestinal flu - editing for this edition is….

  16. December 21st, 2006 | 9:24 am

    The Carnival of Thoughtful Consideration…

    Thank you all for your wonderful contributions! There are some great articles again this week even though there were fewer submissions. Last week I did an e-mail blast which gave us the great turnout. I don’t want…

  17. realist
    December 21st, 2006 | 10:57 am

    isn’t marriage more like bank debt? restrictive covenants with steep penalties for violation

  18. December 21st, 2006 | 5:07 pm

    Realist- It’s just like the movie “The Jerk”. You’re put in front of a firing squad as a penalty.

    No, but seriously, that’s the whole point of the married put. I guess they could have called it a love put, but that’s confusing, because you can love someone but not be in love with someone. So is it the be in love put or just the love put? Married put takes away all of the confusion. The prenup protects you from all of those penalties.

  19. January 3rd, 2007 | 1:06 am

    […] Mister Juggles presents Hedge Funds and Love posted at Long or Short Capital. […]

  20. January 3rd, 2007 | 12:59 pm

    COME ON! It says my name right under the title:

    by Drinky McDiligence

    Juggles never even spells out his first name either.

    I understand that the analysts do the work and the MDs get the credit, but the MDs aren’t even mentioned in this research report.

  21. February 5th, 2007 | 11:21 am

    Great analogy about Hedge Funds and Love. My pet peeve is that Hedge Funds by name are misleading. I think what needs to happen in American is that we distinguish between what traditionally would be known as hedging, protecting one’s capital, and an Investment Fund that takes positions in the markets. Maybe some legislation clarify the difference. They have Investment Funds in Ireland, and I think that this is what they should properly be called.

    Evan Andersen
    Lydia Capital

  22. December 20th, 2007 | 10:06 pm

    […] Juggles presents Hedge Funds and Love posted at Long or Short […]





Add sense to the discussion.