In-Kind Price Targets

by Mr Juggles

Due to the rapid decline of the dollar, we will no longer use the US dollar as the basis for our price targets in our recommendations. Instead, we will use “In-Kind Price Targets” which employ some independent unit of measurement to compare a firm’s value to.


Our former price target for Burger King (NYSE: BKC) was $26 by November 13th, 2007. Now, the new “In Kind” price target would be 8.5 Whoppers per share.


Our former price target for Google (NASDAQ: GOOG) was $650 by November 13th, 2007. Now, the new “In Kind” price target would be 1500 Adsense clicks per share.

Hopefully, this will allow our readers to make better imaginary actions on our recommendations.

Related Reseach:

Ad Sense Ad Sense


  1. PBateman
    November 13th, 2007 | 12:07 pm

    I believe this would create a “#DIV/0!” valuation for ETFC based on the value of your assets after bankruptcy.

  2. Ignatius
    November 13th, 2007 | 1:20 pm

    Not long ago you guys were barely managing two posts a week…and now this resurgence! I take it you were spurred to action by the Catholic priest.

  3. To The Hilt
    November 13th, 2007 | 1:48 pm

    Obviously an attempt to increase Chinese IPO Valuation by ramping up value.

    I suspect this is an LoS bubble.

    I’m enjoying it, though, and hoping there won’t be a Blackstone-esque drop off after the boys cash out.

  4. TheUnrepentantGunner
    November 13th, 2007 | 10:56 pm

    imaginary actions? shit i took some real actions off yall yesterday…

  5. PBJ
    November 14th, 2007 | 4:39 pm

    Also, how many marginal revolution links under the best resources section is optimal? Are we to believe that 1 is too few and 3 too many?

  6. Toro
    November 14th, 2007 | 5:53 pm

    What’s your price target for Playboy?

  7. Charlie McDanger
    November 15th, 2007 | 11:05 am

    I typically put my price target on the centerfold’s forehead.

  8. To The Hilt
    November 15th, 2007 | 2:11 pm

    Top notch, Charlie, top notch!

  9. PBJ
    November 16th, 2007 | 2:24 pm

    So its one then eh?

  10. November 16th, 2007 | 4:11 pm

    That was some sort of copy and pasting mistake. It happens. Im not web designer and the help we have to supplement the little JD knows is minimal.